The Increased Need for Special Needs Trust Planning

There is no doubt that the need for special needs planning is increasing. Just look at these statistics:

• In 1992, there were 15,580 children ages 6-22 who were diagnosed as having what is now called an Autism spectrum disorder. In 2006, the number was 224,594.
• In 2006, there were an estimated 24.9 million adults in the United States with serious psychological distress.
• Approximately 4.4 % of U.S. adults may have some form of bipolar disorder during some point in their lifetime.
• In 2006, an estimated 22.6 million people in the U.S. (9.2% of the population age 12 or older) were substance dependent or abusive in the previous year.

Almost every family has at least one member (child, grandchild, nephew, niece, parent, grandparent) who will always need help managing personal care and/or finances. And since most of these conditions do not decrease life expectancy, many families are seeking answers on how to provide the best quality of life for their loved ones for the rest of their lives . . . which could, for a young child, be 70 years or longer.

Fewer Programs Are Available
At the same time that the need for support services is increasing, government and non-government programs are being reduced and even eliminated due to the strain on state budgets, competition among entitlement programs, and pressures to reduce deficit spending. Once a program is cut, it may be difficult if not impossible to restore it in the future.

Families Are Motivated
Even families who are using them now do not trust that the programs that are benefitting their special loved one will be there to provide the needed benefits in the future. They are wisely (and fearfully) looking at alternatives to provide those services. Common concerns are:

• Who will care for my loved one when I am gone?
• Who will be my loved one's advocate?
• Where will my loved one live?
• How much independence can be maintained?
• Will the money last for my loved one's lifetime?

Preserving Government Benefit Entitlement
Are government benefits for a special needs person worth preserving? For families of lesser means, the answer is almost always, "Yes, absolutely!" For more affluent families, however, maybe not.

It may be better to privatize the special needs person's care instead of spending thousands of dollars to protect a few hundreds in benefits that may not be available in the future. In the past, many practitioners focused exclusively on preserving public benefits at all costs. Today, special needs planning is not necessarily "poverty planning." The proper focus today is, on a case-by-case basis, how to provide the best quality of life throughout the life of the loved one.

Estate Planning Update - No News

It is now May and so far it looks like the Senate is to busy to deal with Estate Tax Reform before November. It is looking more and more like 2010 will be the year when one can die without the imposition of any Estate taxes regardless of the size of one's estate. However, starting January 1, 2011 taxpayers will be limited to an exemption of only $1M dollars. Everything else above that number will be taxed at 55%.

I never dreamed that we would see the actual repeal of the Estate Tax. Nor did I imagine we would ever go back to exemptions and rates that were in effect in 2002. The Federal Estate Tax is like a sponge. It soaks up everything that one owns: cash, bank accounts, CD's, stocks, bonds, investment accounts, retirement plans, real estate and life insurance owned by the person who dies. When one totals up everything on this kind of basis, there are many more "millionaires" today than there were in 10 years ago. Your next door neigbbor might be a millionaire?

Married people get a special break called the "Unlimited Marital Deduction". Any property that passes at death to one's spouse, whether outright, as a designated beneficairy or as the beneficiary of a Marital trust, will qualify for deduction. Often this means there will be no tax at the first spouse's death! But, the IRS is not being that generous. They will just wait until the second spouse dies, subtract the $1M exemption, and then tax the excess at 55%. We often refer to the Federal Estate Tax as the "Tax on the 2nd spouse's life".

It is imperative that when the first spouse dies, that he or she use whatever exemptions are available to the deceased spouse in the year of death. Jointly held property will not get one there. The first spouse needs to set up a Family Trust(sometimes referred to also as a "By-Pass" trust, or a "Residuary Trust" or a "B-Trust"....lawyers just love to call the same thing by different names to confuse people!) at the death of the first spouse. That trust can be for the surviving spouse's benefit during his or her life. But, when the surviving spouse dies, this Family Trust can pass tax free to the heirs as it is not deemed to be "owned" by the 2nd spouse during his or her lifetime. This savings is huge! It could be as much as 55% of $1M dollars =$550,000 starting next year. Jointly held property in this set of circumstances actually increases one's taxes and becomes a trap. Planning before one becomes disabled or dies is essential.

It is entirely possible that we will get a new Tax bill after November's elections. A lot will depend on who is elected. Stay tuned. This is going to be a wild ride for millions of Americans.

Congress to Increase Taxes on Individuals

With the passage of the new Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, starting in 2013 the new law provides for 3.8% tax on “Net Investment Income” to help pay for nearly $1 Trillion in spending under the health care legislation. This has now been labeled the“Medicare Tax”.

For individuals, this 3.8% additional tax is imposed on the lesser of:
(i) Net Investment Income; or,
(ii) Modified adjusted gross income exceeding $250,000 for married couples filing jointly or $200,000 for single tax payers.

This 3.8% tax increase also implies to Net Investment Income of trusts.

Net Investment Income encompasses interest, dividends, capital gains (other than income from an active trader business not primarily engaged in investment trading activity), rent and royalties as reduced for applicable specific deductions.

It appears that tax exempt interest from municipal bonds and similar investments will not be subject to this tax. Also exempt are distributions from IRAs and qualified retirements plans such as 401(k) and profit sharing plans.

With the ending of the Bush tax cuts which are scheduled to expire at the end of 2010 long term capital gains rates will increase next year from 15% to 20% and dividend rates will again be taxed as ordinary income starting next year. With the corresponding expiration of the cuts in ordinary income tax rates, the top rate on dividends will be 39.6% (federal). This will be a resumption of the Clinton-era top income tax rate.

In addition, starting in 2013 the new law increases the 1.45% Medicare portion of FICA taxes by .9% on wages exceeding $250,000 for married couples jointly or $200,000 for single taxpayers. Also, starting in 2013 (and in 2017 for individuals and their spouses age 65 or older) the floor for deducting medical expenses will increase from 7.5% to 10% of adjusted gross income.

However, twenty (20) states have now filed suit to overturn the new law on constitutional grounds. Where this will end up is anyone’s guess at this point? Very few such constitutional challenges are successful. What is apparent is that the trend of current tax law will create significant increases in many individual’s personal income taxes at almost all levels. The need for efficient tax planning is now even more necessary for the preservation of one’s wealth.

Community Spouse Owned Annuities are no longer available resources for Medicaid Purposes

In a decision on April 20, 2010 out of the Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals, the appellate court reversed the trial court and barred the Missouri State Family Support Division from counting a community spouse's ownership of a commercial annuity as an "available resource" to disqualify an institutionalized spouse from Medicaid assistance. The court found that treating a community spouse's income stream from a commercial annuity as an available resource which denied coverage for the institutionalized spouse for Medicaid assistance was a violation of federal Medicaid law.

Creditor Protection Benefit of the Stand Alone IRA Beneficiary Trust

In a recent bankruptcy court decision out of the Eastern District of Texas (In re: Chilton) the court found that an inherited IRA is not the equivalent to an IRA for purposes of determining whether the account contains “retirement funds” that may be exempted from the bankruptcy estate under U.S.C. §522(d)(12).

Courts have listed several reasons for distinguishing an inherited IRA from an IRA which allows the creditors to reach the inherited IRA assets:

• The state exemption was for retirement benefits to be available to the retired person, not a child who was still earning a living;
  
• The beneficiary of an inherited IRA has an unrestricted right to withdrawal of the IRA at any time without any penalties;
  
• And, the IRA is significantly different than an inherited IRA under the Internal Revenue Code.

The Chilton case highlights the dangers of relying on the bankruptcy code to provide protection for an inherited retirement accounts. To obtain solid asset protection we recommend that retirement plans be payable to a Stand Alone IRA Beneficiary Trust that is drafted to qualify as a designated beneficiary under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(9) and that contains spendthrift language. The incremental cost of creating a Stand Alone IRA beneficiary trust is more than offset by the benefit of protecting the inherited IRA assets during the lifetime of the beneficiary from creditors, predators and spouses.

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (H.R. 3590)

On March 23, 210 President Obama signed into law sweeping and historical health care reform legislation, H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Lawmakers are debating H.R. 4872, the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, a reconciliation bill that would amend H.R. 3590. The House passed H.R. 4872 on March 21, 2010 and the Senate must take up the measure.

H.R. 3590 as a stand alone measure provides the following:

• For group health plans and individual health insurance coverage: prohibition from establishing unreasonable annual limits or lifetime limits; restricts rescissions; requires minimum coverage for preventive health services; continues dependent coverage until age 26.
• Creates exchanges for purchasing health insurance coverage.
  Establishes a refundable tax credit to provide premium assistance for coverage under a qualified health plan.
• Provides businesses with a tax credit for the premium cost of health insurance coverage.
• Requires individuals to maintain minimum essential coverage or be subject to a penalty.
• Requires automatic enrollment for employees of large employers.
• Imposes a 40% excise tax on health coverage above certain dollar amounts.
• Raises the HI tax on wages and self-employment income in excess of $200,000 ($250,000 for joint filers) by 0.9%.
• Imposes annual fees on manufacturers and importers of branded drugs, manufacturers and importers of certain medical devices, and health insurance providers.
• Raises the Adjusted Gross Income ("AGI") floor for deducting medical expenses from 7.5% to 10% (7.5% remains in effect for individuals over 65 and their spouses through 2016).
• Implements a $500,000 deduction limitation on taxable year remuneration to officers, employees, directors, and service providers of covered health insurance providers.
• Requires employer W-2 reporting of the value of health benefits.
• Increases the penalty for nonqualified health savings account distributions from 10% to 20%.
• Limits health flexible spending arrangements in cafeteria plans to $2,500 (indexed for inflation after 2011).
• Requires information reporting on payments to corporations.
• Imposes additional requirements for Sec. 501(c)(3) hospitals.
• Conforms the definition of medical expenses for HSAs, Archer MSAs, health FSAs, and HRAs to the definition of the itemized deduction for medical expenses (excludes over-the-counter medications, except if prescribed by a physician).
• Imposes a 10% excise tax on indoor tanning services.
• Makes the adoption credit refundable; increases the qualifying expense threshold; and extends the credit through 2011.

Meanwhile 13 state attorneys general have filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Act. A copy of the complaint is here. It appears the judicial branch will get a chance to weigh in on this legislation.

Estate Planning is a Loving Act

There is no question that estate planning understandably takes an emotional toll on clients. In addition to facing the emotionally charged issues associated with handling money, clients must face their own mortality. Clients may also have to come to grips with strained family relationships, and address how best to provide for the future well being of children or other loved ones. Often, clients "gag and choke" with the gut-wrenching choices that surround the estate planning process. Fear of planning often leads to the paralysis of analysis.

A Loving Act

We believe that estate planning can be a proactive, positive influence. Planning for loved ones is a loving act. It really boils down to "Do you want to determine where your money goes; or, do you want the government (in its infinite wisdom) to do that for you?" We handled an estate of a woman who wrote a will and left everything to her two brothers and sister. Unfortunately, all of her siblings predeceased her without leaving any surviving descendants. When she passed away, she left a sizable estate to unknown cousins who lived in eastern Europe with whom she had very little, if any, contact. These sorts of scenarios do not have to happen. However, statistics tell us that 7 out of 10 Americans will never get around to making an estate plan before they die.

Our Approach

We strive to make your estate planning a life affirming experience. We believe that when a client shares his or her hopes, dreams and goals with us, we can create a plan that will design a legacy which reflects the client's values for years to come. When clients capture the vision of creating something that will survive them, it can actually be "fun"!

A number of years ago a married couple with no children came to me to plan their estate. They were in a serious quandary as to what to do with their wealth. We discussed the idea of establishing a plan that would reflect the values that they supported. They ended up leaving their estate to a series of charitable institutions. One of those institutions was the Ronald McDonald House. I suggested that they allow me to initially contact the various charities on an anonymous basis to let them know that they had been named as a beneficiary. At first, the couple was reluctant. However, after considering our advice , they allowed me to put them in touch with the various charitable entities. The staff at the Ronald McDonald House invited our clients to spend a day touring their facility and visiting with families staying at the house. Not long thereafter the wife passed away. Her husband contacted me after her death to thank me. He told me that the one of the best days of their life together was the day they spent touring the Ronald McDonald House. He was so appreciative that we had helped them to create an enduring legacy for them with their estate plan. The husband has since passed away and now a number of charities have substantially benefited from this couple's estate plan.

An Alternative Approach

We do not profess to have all the answers and solutions. Sometimes bringing in other professionals can help families dealing with some of the emotional problems. We can work with licensed marriage and family therapists who can provide additional family services to assist in dealing with family issues in a legacy context. Often, coming up with a family financial philosophy, something akin to a Family Mission Statement, can create a guide for the making of estate planning suggestions.