Procrastination

The problem for most Americans when it comes to doing an estate plan is the "P" word. The "P" word does not stand for "Probate"; but,for "Procrastination". Most people think that Estate Planning is always something that one will get around to tomorrow. It is never urgent....until something happens.

According to a recent survey by Lawyers.com, the number of Americans with some type of estate planning document has dropped from 64% in 2007 to 51% in 2009. I have heard of other surveys that suggest that fewer than 30% of Americans have properly drafted and funded estate plans in place. I suspect that in these rough economic times, people are simply testing fate to put off the expense of creating their estate plan. What people do not understand is that a good estate plan helps one avoid probate and saves significant wealth for the benefit of one's family. A good estate should have the ability to benefit the beneficiaries many times over the cost of the initial plan. For example, while the cost of a will is rather inexpensive up front, the cost of administering a will through the Probate process [all wills go through probate] can be as much as 6-8% of the value of the entire estate. While one is alive, a will is meaningless. A will only speaks at the date of death. If one becomes incapacitated and a guardian or conservator has to be appointed while one is still living, the annual cost of such probate administration can be literally thousands of dollars. A simple living trust can avoid both the cost of disability probate and death probate.

We often get calls like "Mom is in the intensive care unit having just suffered a stroke. Can you do her estate plan now?" The answer is: NO. The time to do one's planning is long before the crisis of disability or death. If you are loved one has not effectuated an estate plan, do something about it today. Do not procrastinate! It is not a question of "if" you will need this. The only question is "when" you will need it.

A Suggestion for Congress

There is a lot of talk these days about "bipartisanship" in Congress. Perhaps Congress needs to find some baby steps for the concept of putting the American taxpayer ahead of politics. Here is a suggestion for our legislators. Since we are waiting on a new Tax bill to straighten out the debacle of the repeal of the Estate Tax and Generation Skipping Transfer Tax, fix the imposition of the new "Modified Carryover Basis" tax regime that became effective on January 1, 2010. These new income tax rules dealing with basis are a nightmare for the heirs of those who have lost loved ones after January 1 of this year. Assuming the new tax bill will take a while to work out, at least spare those who were unlucky enough to die in this calendar year from the headache of trying to figure out all the new modified carryover basis rules. Surely both sides of the aisle can agree that the imposition of these taxes at this time are patently unfair. A simple bill to repeal the modified Carryover basis rules should be a slam dunk to sail through the House and Senate.

Estate Tax Battle Resumes

Secretary of the Treasury, Timothy Geithner, and the Senate Finance Charmian, Max Baucus agree on one thing. Both want to extend the 2009 estate tax rate and exemption amount to 2010 and make it retroactive to January 1, 2010. In the 2011 budget released Feb. 1 by President Obama, the administration is backing the legislation passed by the House last December to repeal the repeal of the Estate Tax in 2010. Too bad nobody has explained to them the due process clause of the Constitution has been interpreted such that the tax code in effect as of the date of a person's death is the law that is to be imposed. Anyone who has a relative who has died in 2010 and who inherited amounts in excess of the proposed $3.5M exemption may wish to contest such retroactive application of any new estate tax law.

Some insiders suggest that the estate tax bill could be linked to the proposed jobs bill being submitted to boost the economy. All we can say is "stay tuned". The final chapter in this area has not yet been written.

New Haiti Tax Deduction Legislation

On January 20, 2010, the House passed H.R. 4462. This bill permits Haiti relief gifts from January 12 to February 28 of 2010 to be deducted on 2009 tax returns. Following the House passage on the unanimous voice vote, the Senate acted quickly on January 21, 2010 to pass the bill. President Obama is expected to sign the bill within the next week.

Senate Finance Chair Max Baucus (D-MT) stated, "Today, Congress unanimously agreed to extend the tax deadline for charitable giving so Americans can continue to help the relief efforts in Haiti." The Ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, Charles Grassley (R-IA), continued, "Americans give generously to disaster relief and I hope this extension encourages them to give even more. I also hope Americans will make sure the charities they choose are above board. People should be careful to give only to groups they recognize and trust.

"The bill permits cash gifts (not property gifts) from January 12 to February 28 of 2010 to be deducted on the 2009 tax returns. The gifts must be "for the relief of victims in areas affected by the earthquake in Haiti on January 12, 2010." All qualified charities may receive the gifts, so long as they use the funds appropriately for Haiti relief. Because many individuals have made gifts using their telephone, a deduction is also permitted for cash gifts by phone during the above dates. For a telephone gift, donors should retain the telephone bill with the name of the charity, the date of the gift and the amount of the contribution.

Welcome to 2010!

The start of a new year brings with it some very interesting tax developments. Congress adjourned and promised to come back and fix the estate and generation skipping tax this year. So right now if anyone wants to die and pass thier estate along without the impositon of any estate tax at the federal level, the opportunity is yours! Tough advice to give to a client!

However, the generation skipping tax ("GST") is also no more. Anyone contemplating gifts in excess of the current $1,000,000 lifetime gift tax exemption will not have to pay GST tax of 45% to gifts to grandchildren. The gift tax rate was reduced from 45% to 35%. While Congress has talked about making any new taxes retroactive to January 1, 2010, there is some thought that that may be unable to do so based on prior case law. So there exists a window of opportunity for those willing to play the game.

The bad news is that Congress had to come up with some way to make up the revenue loss. So they invented something for this year called "modified carryover basis". This means that the executor of a decedent's estate can elect to "step up" the first $1.3 million of assets to the fair market value of a deceased person's estate as of the date of death. But anything else will be subject to "carryover basis", i.e. the basis in the hands of the heirs will be the same as the lifetime basis of the person who died owning the asset....unless, the decedent was married! A spouse is entitled to an additional $3M dollars of step up in basis election. The result is to increase the income tax on the sale of inherited assets at the time of a subsequent sale. The accounting profession will love this new computation. Congress tried this back in 1976. After two years when they admitted that it was so complicated that nobody could compy with it, Congress repealed it. Now this new system is back again in 2010. I wonder how long it will take Congress to remember that this was a mistake the first time and it is not any better the 2nd time around.

Conclusion: This is the year that everyone should review their estate planning documents to see what the current repeal of the Estate tax does to one's estate planning. There are still so many unknowns that are difficult to predict; but, high net worth estates may be able to do some things right now that will not be available later.

Still No News on the Estate Tax Front

As this week comes to a close, the buzz among estate planners is what Congress has NOT done so far. Time is running out and the ability to fix the unthinkable is dissipating quickly. The unthinkable is that beginning January 1 we will see the elimination of the estate and GST taxes, coupled with the introduction of carryover basis for people who die in 2010. This means that because of the repeal of the estate and GST tax (which only the wealthiest of 2% of the population pays), Congress had to do something else to replace this loss of revenue. Their answer was to do away with the "stepped-up" basis rules and to institute a modified carry over basis for assets that one inherits. This means that starting in 2010 everyone will now pay increased income taxes to offset the tax revenue lost from the Estate and GST tax!

The House is scheduled to recess for the holidays on December 18 and the Senate is focused on health care reform. This is a true dilemma for the estate planning community is that we still don't know what to tell clients to do at this point in time? But on other fronts........

Trademark infringement is a serious matter. A recent case filed in St. Louis however is proving to be the butt of some jokes. For an interesting (and I thought humorous) read check out the following ABA article here.

Health care reform has targeted savings from electronic record keeping as a way to save costs. But the implications of that are staggering. Some are now pointing out the loss of privacy and the exposure of confidential health information. See E-health records.

The Higher Cost of Dying in other states

The Federal government is trying to decide what size of estate tax exemption citizens are going to have next year from the Federal Estate Tax. Under current law the exemption amount is currently $3,500,000.00 in 2009. If Congress does nothing the Federal Estate Tax exempt amount will be unlimited beginning January 1, 2010. I am betting we are going to see last minute legislation at the end of December to prevent the repeal of the repeal of the Estate tax for 2010.

However, state governments are also feeling the economic pinch and looking for ways to increase tax revenues. Dead people are an easy constituency to squeeze because they do not vote. For example, the State of Illinois "decoupled" its estate tax from the federal exemption amount beginning January 1, 2009. In Illinois anyone who dies this year pays an additional estate tax over anything one owns in excess of a $2,000,000 exemption from Illinois estate tax. What does the mean? If a Missouri resident dies with a $3,500,000 taxable gross estate in 2009, the taxpayer pays $0 Federal estate tax and $0 Missouri estate tax. The same taxpayer who dies in Illinois this year pays $0 Federal estate tax and $209,124 in Illinois estate tax. Picking the right state to die in for tax purposes can save some real dollars! Living on the correct side of the Mississippi can benefit one's loved ones significantly!

I think the Missouri tourism commission ought to adopt a new campaign to attract older citizens to move to Missouri before they die.